GRAND RIVER DAM AUTHORITY

v.

GRAND-HYDRO, INC.

Citator

Cited By

• Grand River Dam Auth. v. Grand-Hydro, 335 U.S. 359 (U.S. 1948)
  …,197.26 [*362] from January 19, 1940, which was the date on which the amount fixed by the Commissioners had been paid into court. The Supreme Court of Oklahoma affirmed this judgment, seven to two. 200 Okla. 157, 201 P. 2d 225. We denied certiorari, 332 U. S. 841, but, on rehearing, granted it, 333 U. S. 852, because of the possible significance of the case in relation to the Federal Power Act. The United States filed a brief as amicus curiae, at each stage of the proceedings, supporting the contentions of t…
• Dillard v. Chesapeake & O. RY. Co., 199 F.2d 948 (4th Cir. 1952)
  …7, and Graham v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen, 338 U.S. 232, 70 S.Ct. 14, 94 L.Ed. 22, and the decisions of this court [*950] in Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen v. Tunstall, 4 Cir., 163 F. 2d 289, certiorari denied 332 U.S. 841, 68 S.Ct. 262, 92 L.Ed. 413, and Rolax v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co., 4 Cir, 186 F. 2d 473. As to the laborers who were not represented by a bargaining representative, their right to relief and the jurisdiction of the court to grant it is supported…
• Hinton v. Seaboard AIR Line R. Co., 170 F.2d 892 (4th Cir. 1948)
  …was entered therein restraining the defendants from enforcing against colored firemen employed by the railroad the discriminatory provisions of the two agreements. Following the denial of certiorari by the Supreme Court in the Tunstall case, supra, 332 U.S. 841, 68 S.Ct. 262, and after the entry of the injunction pendente lite in the case at bar, the brotherhood as bargaining representative of all firemen on railroads in the southeastern part of the United States, on January 26, 1948, proposed to the Seabo…