BAXTER
v.
RAGEN, WARDEN
BAXTER
RAGEN, WARDEN
332 U.S. 855
Supreme Court of the United States (1948)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Landstrom v. Thorpe, 189 F.2d 46 (8th Cir. 1951)…1148; Armstrong Paint & Varnish Works v. Nu-Enamel Corp., 305 U.S. 315, 325, 59 S.Ct. 191, 83 L.Ed. 195; Kaplan v. Helenhart Novelty Corporation, 2 Cir., 182 F. 2d 311; Hanson v. Triangle Publications, Inc., 8 Cir., 163 F. 2d 74, certiorari denied, 332 U.S. 855, 68 S.Ct. 387, 92 L.Ed. 424. Damages resulting from the wrongful registration of the trade-mark and for unfair competition must necessarily be proven by the same evidence. It follows that the district court had jurisdiction of both claims. The def…
-
Mut. OF Omaha Ins. Co. v. Franklyn Novak, 836 F.2d 397 (8th Cir. 1988)…Ins. Co., 648 F.Supp. at 910. This is undoubtedly so, for confusion, not competition, is the touchstone of trademark infringement. See SquirtCo, 628 F. 2d at 1091; Hanson v. Triangle Publications, Inc., 163 F. 2d 74, 78 (8th Cir.1947), cert. denied, 332 U.S. 855, 68 S.Ct. 387, 92 L.Ed. 424 (1948). It is error to assume that trademark law protects against use of a mark only on directly competitive products. See Kentucky Fried Chicken, 549 F. 2d at 388 (Fifth Circuit has “repeatedly rejected” the argument tha…