OSCAR JOHNSON, PETITIONER,
v.
TAYLOR INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION ET AL., RESPONDENTS
OSCAR JOHNSON, PETITIONER,
TAYLOR INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION ET AL., RESPONDENTS
178 So. 2d 583
Florida Supreme Court (1965)
Caution
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date May 26, 1965.
We find that oral argument would serve-no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essen-r tial requirements of law.
The petition is therefore denied.
*584It is further ordered that the petitioner’s motion for attorneys’ fees he and the same i's hereby denied.
THORNAL, C. J., and DREW, O’CON-NELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Harris v. United States Fid. & Guar. Co., 409 So. 2d 1210 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982)…ot engine, in contrast to the rapid-combustion explosion in this case. The court in Cramer recognized that coverage would be extended “[i]f heat caused by the mechanical breakdown of the engine had resulted in damage by fire” or other insured peril. 178 So. 2d 583. The qualification of the exclusionary clause in the present case clearly contemplates coverage as a loss “from any external cause” when “fire or other accident ensues” from mechanical failure such as the fuel accumulation here in question. This acc…