BRUNSON
v.
NORTH CAROLINA; KING V. NORTH CAROLINA; JONES V. NORTH CAROLINA; JAMES ET AL. V. NORTH CAROLINA; AND WATKINS ET AL. V. NORTH CAROLINA

U.S. | 1948-03-15
Nos. 292; No. 293; No. 294; No. 295; No. 296
333 U.S. 851 Supreme Court of the United States (1948) Positive Treatment
Cited by 18 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:

Per Curiam:

Reversed. Strauder v. West Virginia, 100 U. S. 303; Ex parte Virginia, 100 U. S. 339; Neal v. Delaware, 103 U. S. 370; Carter v. Texas, 177 U. S. 442; Rogers v. Alabama, 192 U. S. 226; Norris v. Alabama, 294 U. S. 587; Hollins v. Oklahoma, 295 U. S. 394; Hale v. Kentucky, 303 U. S. 613; Pierre v. Louisiana, 306 U. S. 354; Smith v. Texas, 311 U. S. 128; Hill v. Texas, 316 U. S. 400; Patton v. Mississippi, 332 U. S. 463.

Reported below: 227 N. C. 558, 559, 560, 561, 43 S. E. 2d 82, 83.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Brown v. Allen, 344 U.S. 443 (U.S. 1953)
    …ed by a For-syth County grand jury. We recently reversed five North Carolina convictions on the ground that there had been a systematic racial exclusion of Negroes from Forsyth County’s juries for many years prior to 1947. Brunson v. North Carolina, 333 U. S. 851 (1948). Upon a review of the evidence in Brown’s habeas corpus proceeding this Court holds that Forsyth County’s discriminatory jury practice was abandoned in 1949 when the old jury boxes were refilled. The testimony on which the Court relies is tha…
    1 / 5
  • Brooks v. Beto, 366 F.2d 1 (5th Cir. 1966)
    …96, the Court stated: “Discriminations against a race by barring or limiting citizens of that race from participation in jury service are odious to our thought and our Constitution. This has long been accepted as the law. Brunson v. North Carolina, 333 U.S. 851 [68 S.Ct. 634, 92 L.Ed. 1132]; Cassell v. Texas, 339 U.S. 282, 286-287, [70 S.Ct. 629, 631, 94 L.Ed. 839, 846, 847]; State v. Peoples, 131 N.C. 784, 42 S.E. 814. * * * The discrimination forbidden is racial discrimination, however, directed, to acco…
  • George v. United States, 196 F.2d 445 (9th Cir. 1952)
    …his.” Strauder v. West Virginia, supra, 100 U.S. at page 310, 25 L.Ed. 664. This case has been cited with approval very recently in Fay v. New York, 1947, 332 U.S. 261, 287, 67 S.Ct. 1613, 91 L.Ed. 2043, and Brunson v. State of North Carolina, 1948, 333 U.S. 851, 68 S.Ct. 634, 92 L.Ed. 1132. (Emphasis added) . When during the war between the States, the First Conscription Act was passed, it was attacked from various sources by men in public life and in the lower courts. No case ever reached the Supreme Cou…

Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited (12 total)

View all 12 cited authorities →

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw