BELLASKUS

v.

CROSSMAN, OFFICER IN CHARGE, U. S. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE

Citator

Cited By

• Grand River Dam Auth. v. Grand-Hydro, 335 U.S. 359 (U.S. 1948)
  …s the date on which the amount fixed by the Commissioners had been paid into court. The Supreme Court of Oklahoma affirmed this judgment, seven to two. 200 Okla. 157, 201 P. 2d 225. We denied certiorari, 332 U. S. 841, but, on rehearing, granted it, 333 U. S. 852, because of the possible significance of the case in relation to the Federal Power Act. The United States filed a brief as amicus curiae, at each stage of the proceedings, supporting the contentions of the petitioner.2 The petitioner is a conservat…
• United States v. Holton, 227 F.2d 886 (7th Cir. 1955)
  …enied. The attorney general thereupon filed in the United States Supreme Court a motion “for such order as shall plainly direct the action of the Circuit Court in obedience to this Court’s mandate in this case.” The Supreme Court denied this motion. 333 U.S. 852, 68 S.Ct. 729, 92 L.Ed. 1133. . Judge Reynolds made the following entry in his docket: “April 23, 1925. “Defendant in Court in person. Court explains fully to said defendant thru interpreters Daniel Torrisi & Joe Marino meaning & effect of entry…