OHIO OIL CO.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Johnson v. Eisentrager, 339 U.S. 763 (U.S. 1950)
  …Court as such, on behalf of over 200 German enemy aliens confined by American military authorities abroad were filed and denied. Brandt v. United States, and 13 companion cases, 333 U. S. 836; In re Eichel (one petition on behalf of three persons), 333 U. S. 865; Everett v. Truman (one petition on behalf of 74 persons), 334 U. S. 824; In re Krautwurst, and 11 companion cases, 334 U. S. 826; In re Ehlen “et al.,” and In re Girke “et al.,” 334 U. S. 836; In re Gronwald “et al.” 334 U. S. 857; In re Stattmann,…
• Ludecke v. Watkins, 335 U.S. 160 (U.S. 1948)
  …an authority for the President which is now questioned, and the further claim is made that, if what the President did comes within the Act, the Congress could not give him such power.2 Obviously these are issues which properly brought the case here. 333 U. S. 865. Petitioner, a German alien enemy,3 was arrested on December [*163] 8, 1941, and, after proceedings before an Alien Enemy Hearing Board on January 16, 1942, was interned by order of the Attorney General, dated February 9, 1942.4 Under authority of…
• United States v. Essley, 284 F.2d 518 (10th Cir. 1960)
  …leases executed by the-Secretary of the Interior under the Leasing Act of 1920, as amended, this court, in United States v. Ohio Oil Co., 10 Cir., 163 F. 2d 633, 639-640, certiorari denied 333 U.S. 833, 68 S.Ct. 459, 92 L.Ed. 1117, rehearing denied 333 U.S. 865, 68 S.Ct. 738, 92 L.Ed. 1143, said: “We agree with the appellee that in all of his transactions with the lessee, the Secretary acted for and on behalf of the Government in a proprietary capacity, and that his contractual powers were measured by the…