SCHUCKMAN

v.

RUBENSTEIN ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (55 total)

• Miller v. State, 285 So. 2d 41 (Fla. 2d DCA 1973)
  …s v. United States, 5 Cir., 1957, 240 F. 2d 905; Hamilton v. United States, 5 Cir., 1955, 221 F. 2d 611, 615; Schwachter v. United States, 6 Cir., 1956, 237 F. 2d 640, 644; United States v. Gollin, 3 Cir., 1947, 166 F. 2d 123, 126, certiorari denied 333 U.S. 875, 68 S.Ct. 905, 92 L. Ed. 1151. (Emphasis added). We hold that the Roe case, supra, is precisely on point with the instant appeal in that the trial judge in the cited case erred in holding as a matter of law the written instruments to be securities…
• City of Mobile v. Bolden, 446 U.S. 55 (U.S. 1980)
  …es. That was, of course, the approach used in Washington v. Davis, 426 U. S. 229 (1976), to evaluate that issue with regard to Fourteenth Amendment racial discrimination claims. See n. 23, supra. Rice v. Elmore, 165 F. 2d 387 (1947), cert. denied, 333 U. S. 875 (1948), and Baskin v. Brown, 174 F. 2d 391 (1949). See rm. 20, 21, supra, and accompanying text. The Court stated: “A rule that a statute designed to serve neutral ends is nevertheless invalid, absent compelling justification, if in practice it b…
• United States v. Hyde, 448 F.2d 815 (5th Cir. 1971)
  …by a jury according to the procedure and standards appropriate for criminal trials in the federal courts.’ See also Schwachter v. United States, 237 F. 2d 640, 644 (6th Cir. 1956); United States v. Gollin, 166 F. 2d 123, 127 (3d Cir.), cert. denied 333 U.S. 875, 68 S.Ct. 905, 92 L.Ed. 1151 (1948); Carothers v. United States, 161 F. 2d 718, 722 (5th Cir. 1947).” United States v. Hayward, 1969, 136 U.S.App.D.C. 300, 420 F. 2d 142, 144. The majority decision in the present case is, I submit, in conflict wit…