KING ET AL.

v.

PRIEST ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Acheson v. Droesse, 197 F.2d 574 (D.C. Cir. 1952)
  …ich become moot pending appeal, and in which a motion to dismiss as moot is accompanied by a motion to' direct that the judgment below be vacated, both motions should be granted. Counsel for Mrs. Droesse cites Schenley Distilling Corp. v. Anderson, 333 U.S. 878, 68 S.Ct. 914, 92 L.Ed. 1154 (1948), Pan American Airways Corp. v. Grace & Co., 332 U.S. 827, 68 S.Ct. 203, 92 L.Ed. 401 (1947), and Uyeki v. Styer, 329 U.S. 689, 67 S.Ct. 486, 91 L.Ed. 604 (1947), as moot cases in which, because there was no likeli…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Md. Cas. Co. v. Hallatt, 295 F.2d 64 (5th Cir. 1961)
  …L.Ed. 2079, 160 A.L.R. 1231. This being so, a federal court is not bound by a decision which would not be binding upon the courts of the state. King v. Order of United Commercial Travelers, 333 U.S. 153, 68 S.Ct. 488, 92 L.Ed. 608, rehearing denied 333 U.S. 878, 68 S.Ct. 900, 92 L.Ed. 1153. The Florida courts have held, on a number of occasions, that the language in a judicial opinion which is not essential to the decision is without force as a precedent. State v. Florida State Improvement Commission, Fla.…
• A. L. Kornman Co. v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of Am., 264 F.2d 733 (6th Cir. 1959)
  …e granting such jurisdiction. Trust Co. of Chicago v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 7 Cir., 183 F. 2d 640, 642, 21 A.L.R.2d 238; Badger v. Reich Bros. Const. Co., 5 Cir., 161 F. 2d 289, 290, affirmed 333 U.S. 163, 68 S.Ct. 587, 92 L.Ed. 614, rehearing denied 333 U.S. 878, 68 S.Ct. 900, 92 L.Ed. 1153. It is carefully guarded against expansion by judicial interpretation. American Fire & Casualty Co. v. Finn, 341 U.S. 6, 17, 71 S.Ct. 534, 95 L.Ed. 702. If the jurisdiction should be enlarged, Congress can easily do so…