LOVELADY
v.
TEXAS

U.S. | 1948-04-26
No. 722
333 U.S. 879 Supreme Court of the United States (1948) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Wolf v. Colorado, 338 U.S. 25 (U.S. 1949)
    …urth Amendment as applied in Weeks v. United States, 232 U. S. 383? The Supreme Court of Colorado has sustained convictions in which such evidence was admitted, 117 Col. 279, 187 P. 2d 926; 117 Col. 321, 187 P. 2d 928, and we brought the cases here. 333 U. S. 879. Unlike the specific requirements and restrictions placed by the Bill of Rights (Amendments I to VIII) upon the administration of criminal justice by federal authority, the Fourteenth Amendment did not subject criminal justice in the States to speci…
  • Wade v. Mayo, 334 U.S. 672 (U.S. 1948)
    …raised at any time. If the state court passes upon the merits, this Court can review the constitutional question upon appeal or petition for certiorari. Herndon v. Lowry, 301 U. S. 242, 247. See Lovelady v. Texas, 333 U. S. 867 (cert. granted), id. 333 U. S. 879 (dismissed), Ex parte Lovelady, — Tex. Cr. R. —, 207 S. W. 2d 396. I would not here decide whether or not this rule applies to cases which are governed by the principle of Moore v. Dempsey, supra, or to the situation in which a state attempts to in…
  • United States v. Dioguardi, 492 F.2d 70 (2d Cir. 1974)
    …ustin v. People, 106 Colo. 506, 107 P. 2d 798 (1940); Brown v. State, 219 Ark. 647, 243 S.W. 2d 938 (1951); Ex parte Lovelady, 152 Tex.Cr.R. 93, 207 S.W. 2d 396 (Tex.Cr.App.1947), cert. granted, 333 U.S. 867, 68 S.Ct. 787, 92 L.Ed. 787, cert. dism., 333 U.S. 879, 68 S.Ct. 914, 92 L.Ed. 1154 (1948); Durham v. State, 182 Tenn. 577, 188 S.W. 2d 555 (1945); State v. Bucy, 104 Mont. 416, 66 P. 2d 1049 (1937); Eastman Kodak Stores, Inc. v. Summers, Mo.App., 377 S.W. 2d 476 (Kan.C.C.A.1964). . See Jordan v. Massa…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw