NEBRASKA

v.

UNITED STATES ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (11 total)

• Alamo Land & Cattle Co., Inc. v. Arizona, 424 U.S. 295 (U.S. 1976)
  …uit’s decision appeared to implicate this Court’s decision in Lassen v. Arizona ex rel. Arizona Highway Dept., 385 U. S. 458 (1967), and because it was claimed to be in conflict with Nebraska v. United States, 164 F. 2d 866 (CA8 1947), cert. denied, 334 U. S. 815 (1948), we granted Alamo’s petition for certiorari. 420 U. S. 971 (1975). II The Lassen case was an action instituted by the Arizona Highway Department to prohibit the application by the State Land Commissioner of rules governing the acquisition o…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Locust Cartage Co., Inc. v. Transamerican Freight Lines, Inc., 430 F.2d 334 (1st Cir. 1970)
  …e reasons, we think, that the statute obliges carriers to collect their published tariffs from all who use their services, not merely from shippers. 49 U.S.C. § 317(b); see ICC v. North Pier Terminal Co., 164 F. 2d 640 (7th Cir. 1947), cert. denied, 334 U. S. 815, 68 S.Ct. 1071, 92 L.Ed. 1746 (1948). This obligation is best enforced by treating one carrier as legally obliged to collect and the other to pay the published tariffs regardless of contrary agreement. Cf. Lowden v. Simonds-Shields-Lonsdale Grain…
• United States v. Certain Prop. Located IN the Borough OF Manhattan, 344 F.2d 142 (2d Cir. 1965)
  …1423 (7 Cir. 1944); Carmichall v. United States, 273 F. 2d 392 (5 Cir. 1960). The authority of these cases is in no way vitiated by later ones in two of these circuits, State of Nebraska v. United States, 164 F. 2d 866 (8 Cir. 1947), cert. denied, 334 U.S. 815, 68 S.Ct. 1070, 92 L.Ed. 1745 (1948), and United States v. Certain Interests in Property in Cham-paign County, 271 F. 2d 379 (7 Cir. 1959), cert. denied, 362 U.S. 974, 80 S.Ct. 1058, 4 L.Ed.2d 1010 (1960). The Nebraska case rejected a contention t…