PARKER
v.
ILLINOIS
PARKER
ILLINOIS
334 U.S. 816
Supreme Court of the United States (1948)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 68 S. Ct. 1082 · 1948 U.S. LEXIS 2178 · SCDB 1947-119
Cited by 4 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:
Mr. Justice Jackson is of the opinion that the writ of cer-tiorari should be dismissed and did not participate in the question as to the disposition of the case on its merits. With respect to the merits the judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.
Petitioner argued the cause and filed a brief pro se. William C. Wines, Assistant Attorney General of Illinois, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was George F. Barrett, Attorney General.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hampton v. Thompson, 171 F.2d 535 (5th Cir. 1948)…ose of Order of Railroad Telegraphers v. New Orleans, T. & M. Ry. Co., 8 Cir., 156 F. 2d 1, certiorari denied 329 U.S. 758, 67 S.Ct. 112, 91 L.Ed. 654 and Missouri-Kansas-Texas R. Co. v. Randolph, 8 Cir., 164 F. 2d 4, certiorari denied 334 U.S. 818, 68 S.Ct. 1082, are precise authority in support of the trial court’s action, unless the fact, that the plaintiffs in this suit are Negroes and plaintiffs in those were not, requires a different rule. What and all that is for decision here, then, is whether the f…
-
Harvey v. United Transp. Union, 878 F.2d 1235 (10th Cir. 1989)…od of R.R. Trainmen v. Howard, 343 U.S. 768, 72 S.Ct. 1022, 96 L.Ed. 1283 (1952); Randolph v. Missouri-K.-T. R.R., 68 F.Supp. 1007 (W.D.Mo. 1946), 7 F.R.D. 54 (W.D.Mo.1947), rev’d and remanded, 164 F. 2d 4 (8th Cir.1947), cert. denied, 334 U.S. 818, 68 S.Ct. 1082, 92 L.Ed. 1748 (1948), on remand, 78 F.Supp. 727 (W.D.Mo.1948), 85 F.Supp. 846 (W.D.Mo.1949), aff’d, 182 F. 2d 996 (8th Cir.1950), 209 F. 2d 634 (8th Cir.1954) (affirming trial court on merits). . See Hunter v. Atchison, T. & S.F. Ry., 78 F.Supp. 9…