RANDOLPH ET AL.
v.
MISSOURI-KANSAS-TEXAS RAILROAD CO. ET AL.; AND MISSOURI-KANSAS-TEXAS RAILROAD CO. ET AL. V. RANDOLPH ET AL.
RANDOLPH ET AL.
MISSOURI-KANSAS-TEXAS RAILROAD CO. ET AL.; AND MISSOURI-KANSAS-TEXAS RAILROAD CO. ET AL. V. RANDOLPH ET AL.
334 U.S. 818
Supreme Court of the United States (1948)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States ex rel. Dorfler v. Watkins, 171 F.2d 431 (2d Cir. 1948)…on default, to apply for a new writ in the event that the Supreme Court shall rule that default judgments of denaturalization are invalid. That issue is now pending in the case of Klapprott v. United States, 3 Cir., 166 F. 2d 273, certiorari granted 334 U.S. 818, 68 S.Ct. 1086.…
-
Hampton v. Thompson, 171 F.2d 535 (5th Cir. 1948)…at case and those of Order of Railroad Telegraphers v. New Orleans, T. & M. Ry. Co., 8 Cir., 156 F. 2d 1, certiorari denied 329 U.S. 758, 67 S.Ct. 112, 91 L.Ed. 654 and Missouri-Kansas-Texas R. Co. v. Randolph, 8 Cir., 164 F. 2d 4, certiorari denied 334 U.S. 818, 68 S.Ct. 1082, are precise authority in support of the trial court’s action, unless the fact, that the plaintiffs in this suit are Negroes and plaintiffs in those were not, requires a different rule. What and all that is for decision here, then, i…
-
Harvey v. United Transp. Union, 878 F.2d 1235 (10th Cir. 1989)…nom. Brotherhood of R.R. Trainmen v. Howard, 343 U.S. 768, 72 S.Ct. 1022, 96 L.Ed. 1283 (1952); Randolph v. Missouri-K.-T. R.R., 68 F.Supp. 1007 (W.D.Mo. 1946), 7 F.R.D. 54 (W.D.Mo.1947), rev’d and remanded, 164 F. 2d 4 (8th Cir.1947), cert. denied, 334 U.S. 818, 68 S.Ct. 1082, 92 L.Ed. 1748 (1948), on remand, 78 F.Supp. 727 (W.D.Mo.1948), 85 F.Supp. 846 (W.D.Mo.1949), aff’d, 182 F. 2d 996 (8th Cir.1950), 209 F. 2d 634 (8th Cir.1954) (affirming trial court on merits). . See Hunter v. Atchison, T. & S.F. Ry…