MELLON

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Jungersen v. Ostby & Barton Co., 335 U.S. 560 (U.S. 1949)
  …. 69 F. Supp. 922. The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed. 166 F. 2d 807. Vacating the prior orders which denied it in the Ostby and Barton proceeding, we granted certiorari in both cases in order to settle the conflict. 334 U. S. 835.1 Since the parties do not assert error in those portions of the lower courts’ decisions which concern infringement, the sole issue before us is the validity of the patent. The method described in the Jungersen patent, Claims 1-4, consists of the f…
• Cold Metal Process Co. & The Union Nat'l Bank of Youngstown v. E. W. Bliss Co., 285 F.2d 231 (6th Cir. 1960)
  …, and a description of the patents themselves are fully set out in United States v. Cold Metal Process Co., D.C.N.D.Ohio, 62 F.Supp. 127, affirmed, 6 Cir., 164 F. 2d 754, certiorari denied 334 U.S. 811, 68 S.Ct. 1016, 92 L.Ed. 1742, rehearing denied 334 U.S. 835, 68 S.Ct. 1343, 92 L.Ed. 1761, and Cold Metal Process Company v. Republic Steel Corp., D.C.N.D.Ohio, 123 F.Supp. 525, affirmed, 6 Cir., 233 F. 2d 828, certiorari denied 352 U.S. 891, 77 S.Ct. 128, 1 L.Ed.2d 86, rehearing denied 352 U.S. 955, 77 S.Ct…
• Dixie Sand & Gravel Corp. v. Holland, 255 F.2d 304 (6th Cir. 1958)
  …n & Co., 1 Cir., 242 F. 2d 526, 529, Note 1. Apparently, such a conflict exists in our own circuit. United States v. Cold Metal Process Co., 6 Cir., 164 F. 2d 754, 755, certiorari denied 334 U.S. 811, 68 S.Ct. 1016, 92 L.Ed. 1742, rehearing denied, 334 U.S. 835, 68 S.Ct. 1343, 92 L.Ed. 1761; Rich v. Pappas, 6 Cir., 229 F. 2d 308, 313. In our most recent ruling on this question in the Rich case we held that reasonable inferences drawn by the District Judge from uneontradicted facts were controlling on revie…