HARRIS
v.
CITY OF NEW YORK; AND IN RE BANTZ
HARRIS
CITY OF NEW YORK; AND IN RE BANTZ
334 U.S. 836
Supreme Court of the United States (1948)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Johnson v. Eisentrager, 339 U.S. 763 (U.S. 1950)…In re Eichel (one petition on behalf of three persons), 333 U. S. 865; Everett v. Truman (one petition on behalf of 74 persons), 334 U. S. 824; In re Krautwurst, and 11 companion cases, 334 U. S. 826; In re Ehlen “et al.,” and In re Girke “et al.,” 334 U. S. 836; In re Gronwald “et al.” 334 U. S. 857; In re Stattmann, and 3 companion cases, 335 U. S. 805; In re Vetter, and 6 companion cases, 335 U. S. 841; In re Eckstein, 335 U. S. 851; In re Heim, 335 U. S. 856; In re Dammann, and 4 companion cases, 336 U.…
-
Uveges v. Pennsylvania, 335 U.S. 437 (U.S. 1948)…894. We think this record adequately raised the federal constitutional question as to denial of counsel. Pennsylvania makes no contrary contention.1 We granted the [*440] motion to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari, 334 U. S. 836, in order to examine the important constitutional question presented by petitioner’s claim of right to counsel.2 Since our understanding is. that in Pennsylvania habeas corpus is available to an accused whose constitutional right to counsel has bee…
-
Hirota v. MacArthur, 335 U.S. 876 (U.S. 1948)…United States, 333 U. S. 836; Handloser v. United States, 333 U. S. 836; Rose v. United States, 333 U. S. 836; Schroeder v. United States, 333 U. S. 836; Becker-Freyseng v. United States, 333 U. S. 836; Everett v. Truman, 334 U. S. 824; In re Ehlen, 334 U. S. 836; In re Girke, 334 U. S. 836; In re Gronwald, 334 U. S. 857; In re Wentzel, 335 U. S. 805; In re Hans, 335 U. S. 841; In re Heim, 335 U. S. 856; In re Eckstein, 335 U. S. 851.…