FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

v.

CEMENT INSTITUTE ET AL.; FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION V. AETNA PORTLAND CEMENT CO. ET AL.; FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION V. CALAVERAS CEMENT CO. ET AL.; FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION V. HURON PORTLAND CEMENT CO.; FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION V. SMITH ET AL.; FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION V. MARQUETTE CEMENT MANUFACTURING CO.; FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION V. SUPERIOR PORTLAND CEMENT, INC.; FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION V. NORTHWESTERN PORTLAND CEMENT CO.; FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION V. RIVERSIDE CEMENT CO.; FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION V. UNIVERSAL ATLAS CEMENT CO.; AND FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION V. CALIFORNIA PORTLAND CEMENT CO.

Citator

Cited By

• Duffield v. Charleston Area Med. Ctr., Inc., 503 F.2d 512 (4th Cir. 1974)
  …2 Cal.Rptr. 779, cert. denied 364 U. S. 893, 81 S.Ct. 224, 5 L.Ed.2d 188. That the rule is not in practice so applied was made clear in Federal Trade Com’n. v. Cenent Institute (1948) 333 U.S. 683, 703, 68 S.Ct. 793, 804, 92 L.Ed. 1010, reh. denied 334 U.S. 839, 68 S.Ct. 1492, 92 L.Ed. 1764, where the Court said: “ * * * In fact, judges frequently try the same case more than once and decide identical issues each time, although these issues involve questions both of law and fact.” While the bulk of the ca…
• Crawford v. Am. Title Ins. Co., 518 F.2d 217 (5th Cir. 1975)
  …cover a broad spectrum of unauthorized trade practices, including establishment of rates and charges. F.T.C. v. Brown Shoe, 384 U.S. 316, 86 S.Ct. 1501, 16 L.Ed.2d 587; F.T.C. v. Cement Institute, 333 U.S. 683, 68 S.Ct. 793, 92 L.Ed. 1010, reh. den. 334 U.S. 839, 68 S.Ct. 1492, 92 L.Ed. 1764. More importantly here, it has been uniformly held that “a violation of the Sherman Act is an ‘unfair method of competition’ under the Federal Trade Commission Act.” Federal Trade Commission v. Beech-Nut Packing Co., 25…
• Luria Bros. & Co., Inc. v. Fed. Trade Comm'n, 389 F.2d 847 (3d Cir. 1968)
  …sing Service Co., 344 U.S. 392, 73 S.Ct. 361, 97 L.Ed. 426 (1953), rehearing denied, 345 U.S. 914, 73 S.Ct. 638, 97 L.Ed. 1348 (1953); Federal Trade Commission v. Cement Institute, 333 U.S. 683, 68 S.Ct. 793, 92 L. Ed. 1010 (1948), rehearing denied, 334 U.S. 839, 68 S.Ct. 1492, 92 L.Ed. 1764 (1948); Federal Trade Commission v. R. F. Keppel & Bro., 291 U.S. 304, 54 S.Ct. 423, 78 L.Ed. 814 (1934); Federal Trade Commission v. Raladam Co., 283 U.S. 643, 51 S.Ct. 587, 75 L.Ed. 1324 (1931). Speaking of the Commis…