SHOCKLEY

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Singer v. State, 109 So. 2d 7 (Fla. 1959)
  …all, of the State. In such cases it would be difficult to find a county in which the residents thereof had not heard or read of the crime and formed opinions thereon. See Shockley v. United States, 9 Cir., 1948, 166 F. 2d 704, 709, certiorari denied 334 U.S. 850, 68 S.Ct. 1502, 92 L.Ed. 1773. The difficulty of preserving to one accused of crime a trial by a fair and impartial jury made up of jurors who “ * * * come to the investigation of each case free from any preconceived impression of it whatever”, as…
• Oliver v. State, 239 So. 2d 637 (Fla. 1st DCA 1970)
  …all, of the State. In such cases it would be difficult to find a county in which the residents thereof had not heard or read of the crime and formed opinions thereon. See Shockley v. United States, 9 Cir., 1948, 166 F. 2d 704, 709, certiorari denied 334 U.S. 850, 68 S.Ct. 1502, 92 L.Ed. 1773.” Even though the factual and noninflammatory media coverage of the pretrial proceedings which occurred in the case sub judice may have created incriminatory impressions in the minds of some readers who would later be…
• United States v. Augustin Alvarez, 755 F.2d 830 (11th Cir. 1985)
  …e achievement of one of the primary goals. See, e.g., Shockley v. United States, 166 F. 2d 704, 715 (9th Cir.) (conspiracy to escape by violent means from federal penitentiary; substantive crime of first degree murder of prison guard), cert. denied, 334 U.S. 850, 68 S.Ct. 1502, 92 L.Ed. 1773 (1948); United States v. Brant, 448 F.Supp. 781, 782 (W.D.Pa.1978) (narcotics conspiracy; substantive crime of possession of a firearm during commission of a felony). In either of these two categories, Pinkerton liabil…