HILLIARD

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Wilkerson v. McCARTHY, 336 U.S. 53 (U.S. 1949)
  …is v. Union P. R. Co., 329 U. S. 649. Pauly v. McCarthy, 330 U. S. 802. Myers v. Reading Co., 331 U. S. 477 (Safety Appliance Act). Lillie v. Thompson, 332 U. S. 459. Anderson v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co., 333 U. S. 821. Eubanks v. Thompson, 334 U. S. 854. Penn v. Chicago & N. W. R. Co., 335 U. S. 849. Coray v. Southern Pacific Co., 335 U. S. 520. Wilkerson v. McCarthy, 336 U. S. 53. [*72] I. Cases in which certiorari was granted — Continued. B. Where lower court which set aside a jury verdict fo…
• Ferguson v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc., 352 U.S. 521 (U.S. 1957)
  …l of complaint reversed. Hunter v. Texas Electric R. Co., 332 U. S. 827;* affirmance of judgment for defendant affirmed. Anderson v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co., 333 U. S. 821 ;* affirmance of judgment for defendant reversed. Eubanks v. Thompson, 334 U. S. 854;* reversal of judgment for plaintiff reversed. 1948 Term. Eckenrode v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 335 U. S. 329; affirmance of judgment n. o. v. for defendant affirmed. Coray v. Southern Pacific Co., 335 U. S. 520; affirmance of directed verdict for de…
• Inland Steel Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 170 F.2d 247 (7th Cir. 1948)
  …senting opinion in which the dissenting Judge viewed the provision as unconstitutional. In the Herzog case the court also sustained the constitutionality of Sec. 9(f) and (g). On appeal, the Supreme Court in a Per Curiam order entered June 21, 1948, 334 U. S. 854, S.Ct. 1529, affirmed the statutory court as to these two paragraphs but found it unnecessary to consider the validity of Sec. 9(h). I find myself in disagreement with my associates. Judge Kerner has written an opinion, concurred in by Judge Minton…