LEIMAN ET AL.

v.

GUTTMAN ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc. v. Du Mond, 336 U.S. 525 (U.S. 1949)
  …license is in the public interest. . . .” This finding follows the statutory language. See Note 3. 297 N. Y. 209, 78 N. E. 2d 476. U. S. Const., Art. I, §8, cl. 3, granting Congress power “To regulate Commerce . . . among the several States ...” 335 U. S. 808. “. . . nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.” The Court said: “The Commonwealth [of Pennsylvania] does no…
• Foley Bros., Inc. v. Filardo, 336 U.S. 281 (U.S. 1949)
  …e of the statute quoted above, it concluded, “Words of such inclusive reach cannot properly be read to exclude contracts for government jobs abroad.” We granted certiorari to settle this important question concerning the scope of the Eight Hour Law. 335 U. S. 808. Since the question is one of statutory interpretation, the Act as it now exists, 40 U. S. C. §§ 321-326, is our starting point. In pertinent part it provides for the limitation to eight hours per day of the working time of laborers and mechanics…