HART ET AL.

v.

MUTUAL BENEFIT LIFE INSURANCE CO.

Citator

Cited By (24 total)

• United States v. Cronic, 466 U.S. 648 (U.S. 1984)
  …loch v. United States, 187 F. 2d 854, later proceeding, 193 F. 2d 889 (CA9 1951) (per curiam), cert. denied, 343 U. S. 934 (1952); Rakes v. United States, 163 F. 2d 771, 772-773 (CA4 1947) (per curiam), later proceeding, 169 F. 2d 739, cert. denied, 335 U. S. 826 (1948); 8 A J. Moore, Moore’s Federal Practice ¶33.03[2] (1983); 3 C. Wright, Federal Practice and Procedure § 557, pp. 338-340 (2d ed. 1982). See also United States v. Johnson, 327 U. S. 106, 109-110 (1946). The Court of Appeals did not reach this…
• United States v. Irie E. Leonard, 494 F.2d 955 (D.C. Cir. 1974)
  …nly once. Hines, 455 F. 2d at 1334, quoting Parker v. United States, 404 F. 2d 1193, 1196 (9 [*966] Cir.1968), cert, denied, 394 U.S. 1004, 89 S.Ct. 1602, 22 L.Ed.2d 782 (1969). See Rakes v. United States, 169 F. 2d 739, 744 (4 Cir.), cert, denied, 335 U.S. 826, 69 S.Ct. 51, 93 L.Ed. 380 (1948). B. Sarvis contends that he was prejudiced, and severance was required, because the government’s case against his co-defendants was more damaging that the case against him. Six witnesses testified that Leonard was…
• United States v. Ellison, 557 F.2d 128 (7th Cir. 1977)
  …motions for a new trial while appeals are pending, implicitly authorizes the district courts to hear and deny such post-appeal motions. United States v. Hays, supra at 275; Rakes v. United States, 163 F. 2d 771, 772-73 (4th Cir. 1947), cert. denied, 335 U.S. 826, 69 S.Ct. 51, 93 L.Ed. 380 (1948). We believe it necessary to resolve this issue here, for, [*132] unless the district court had the power to entertain Ellison’s motion for a new trial while an appeal from his convictions was pending, there is no…