TUTHILL

v.

CALIFORNIA

Citator

Cited By

• RED Lion Broad. Co., Inc. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n & United States, 381 F.2d 908 (D.C. Cir. 1967)
  …App.D.C. 40, 175 F. 2d 351 (1949); Bay State Beacon, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, 84 U.S.App.D.C. 216, 171 F. 2d 826 (1948); and in Simmons v. Federal Communications Commission, 83 U.S.App. D.C. 262, 169 F. 2d 670 (1948), cert, denied, 335 U.S. 846, 69 S.Ct. 67, 93 L.Ed. 396 (1948). It appears to be well documented, then, that because of its unique characteristics the courts have consistently held that regulatory action by the Commission, acting within the framework and provisions of the stat…
• Nat'l Citizens Comm. FOR Broad. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n & United States, 555 F.2d 938 (D.C. Cir. 1977)
  …FCC, 116 U.S.App. D.C. 93, 321 F. 2d 359, cert, denied, 375 U.S. 951, 84 S.Ct. 442, 11 L.Ed.2d 312 (1963); Carroll Broadcasting Co. v. FCC, 103 U.S.App.D.C. 346, 258 F. 2d 440 (1958); Simmons v. FCC, 83 U.S.App.D.C. 262, 169 F. 2d 670, cert, denied, 335 U.S. 846, 69 S.Ct. 67, 93 L.Ed. 396 (1948); Chicagoland TV Co., 11 F.C.C.2d 119, 136-137 (1967) (Hearing Exam.); See Policy Statement on Comparative Broadcast Hearings, 1 F.C. C.2d 393, 394-396 (1965). Note, Diversifica [*949] tion and the Public Interest: A…