RICHARDSON

v.

NEW YORK

Citator

Cited By (11 total)

• Price v. Time, Inc., 416 F.3d 1327 (11th Cir. 2005)
  …, and Nicole are not in the record. We may consider only evidence that was before the district court when it made its decision. See Harris v. United States, 768 F. 2d 1240, 1242 (11th Cir.1985), vacated on other grounds, 479 U.S. 957, 107 S.Ct. 450, 93 L.Ed.2d 398 (1986). Moreover, so far as the record before us shows, none of the women was under oath when she spoke to Price or his counsel and none was subject to cross-examination. “The object of requiring an oath is to instill in the witness an awareness of…
• United States v. Roth, 237 F.2d 796 (2d Cir. 1956)
  …nt and depraved crimes. The Court said in passing, 333 U.S. at page 510, 68 S.Ct. at page 667, that legislation subjecting obscéne publications to governmental control is valid. In Doubleday & Co. v. People of State of New York, 1948, 335 U.S. 848, 69 S.Ct. 79, 93 L.Ed. 398, the Court, by an evenly divided vote, without opinion affirmed a state court decision sustaining a state obscenity statute. In United States v. Alpers, 1950, 338 U.S. 680, 70 S.Ct. 352, 94 L.Ed. 457, the Court construed the statute a…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Horn v. Kean, 796 F.2d 668 (3d Cir. 1986)
  …New York, 383 U.S. 502, 86 S.Ct. 958, 16 L.Ed.2d 56 (1966); Jacobellis v. Ohio, 378 U.S. 184, 84 S.Ct. 1676, 12 L.Ed.2d 793 (1964); Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476, 77 S.Ct. 1304, 1 L.Ed.2d 1498 (1957); Doubleday & Co. v. New York, 335 U.S. 848, 69 S.Ct. 79, 93 L.Ed. 398 (1948). . Being of the view that the foregoing discussion is not necessary to the decision in this case, Judge Becker does not join in Part IV. . The holding is not without its critics, even by some members of this court. For an anal…