PENN

v.

CHICAGO & NORTH WESTERN RAILWAY CO.

Citator

Cited By

• Wilkerson v. McCARTHY, 336 U.S. 53 (U.S. 1949)
  …McCarthy, 330 U. S. 802. Myers v. Reading Co., 331 U. S. 477 (Safety Appliance Act). Lillie v. Thompson, 332 U. S. 459. Anderson v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co., 333 U. S. 821. Eubanks v. Thompson, 334 U. S. 854. Penn v. Chicago & N. W. R. Co., 335 U. S. 849. Coray v. Southern Pacific Co., 335 U. S. 520. Wilkerson v. McCarthy, 336 U. S. 53. [*72] I. Cases in which certiorari was granted — Continued. B. Where lower court which set aside a jury verdict for an employee or rendered judgment for the employ…
• Ferguson v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc., 352 U.S. 521 (U.S. 1957)
  …48 Term. Eckenrode v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 335 U. S. 329; affirmance of judgment n. o. v. for defendant affirmed. Coray v. Southern Pacific Co., 335 U. S. 520; affirmance of directed verdict for defendant reversed. Penn v. Chicago & N. W. R. Co., 335 U. S. 849;* reversal of judgment for plaintiff reversed. Wilkerson v. McCarthy, 336 U. S. 53; affirmance of directed verdict for defendant reversed. [*558] Reynolds v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co., 336 U. S. 207;* affirmance of judgment for defendant on demurr…
• S. Pac. Co. v. Mahl, 406 F.2d 1201 (5th Cir. 1969)
  …ends of the cars. Stated another way: In order to establish that the coupler was defective, proof of the necessity of going between the cars is not required. We find ample authority to support our holding. In Penn v. Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co., 1948, 335 U.S. 849, 69 S.Ct. 79, 93 L.Ed. 398, the Supreme Court affirmed a judgment entered under the Safety Appliance Act in favor of an employee who was injured when his foot slipped into a space at a switch stand after several unsuccessful attempts to uncouple two…

  ← 1 / 2 →

Authorities Cited

• Myers v. Reading Co., 331 U.S. 477 (U.S. 1947)