BLANC

v.

SPARTAN TOOL CO.

Citator

Cited By (36 total)

• Diamante Urga v. State, 155 So. 2d 719 (Fla. 2d DCA 1963)
  …Government, or any reason why the exhibits should be regarded as in any way untrustworthy. Appellants’ contention must be rejected. See, generally, Pasadena Research Laboratories, Inc. v. United States, 9 Cir., 169 F. 2d 375, certiorari denied 1948, 335 U.S. 853, 69 S.Ct. 83, 93 L.Ed. 401.” (Emphasis supplied) Another case cited by the defendant is Brown v. State, 1951, 156 Tex.Cr.R. 144, 240 S.W. 2d 310. Brown was arrested for driving while intoxicated and was taken to a hospital where a nurse took a spec…
• Standard OIL Co. OF Cal. v. Moore, 251 F.2d 188 (9th Cir. 1957)
  …should be included, it is for the trial judge, in the exercise of his discretion, to determine whether the question should be reframed to add such facts. Pasadena Research Laboratories v. United States, 9 Cir., 169 F. 2d 375. 384, certiorari denied, 335 U.S. 853, 69 S.Ct. 83, 93 L.Ed. 401. If the trial judge does not require this to be done, it is seldom that prejudicial error can be said to result. This is because the objecting party can, through cross-examination, expose to the jury the asserted deficien…
• Gass v. United States, 416 F.2d 767 (D.C. Cir. 1969)
  …elivery in Baltimore was unnecessary since he was only a courier. . See International Shoe Co. v. FTC, 280 U.S. 291, 302, 50 S.Ct. 89, 74 L.Ed. 431. (1930); Pasadena Research Laboratories v. United States, 169 F. 2d 375, 382 (9th Cir.), cert. denied 335 U.S. 853, 69 S.Ct. 83, 93 L.Ed. 401 (1948). . Pasadena Research Laboratories v. United States, supra note 10, 169 F. 2d at 382. See also the cases cited infra notes 20-21 and accompanying text. . United States v. S. B. Penick & Co., 136 F. 2d 413, 415 (2d…