MASICH
v.
UNITED STATES SMELTING, REFINING & MINING CO. ET AL.
MASICH
UNITED STATES SMELTING, REFINING & MINING CO. ET AL.
335 U.S. 866
Supreme Court of the United States (1948)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a properly presented federal question.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Griffin v. United States, 336 U.S. 704 (U.S. 1949)…es Code to review the dismissal by the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia of an appeal from the denial of a motion for a new trial on the ground of evidence discovered after the petitioner had been convicted of murder in the first degree. 335 U. S. 866. The decisive issue is the admissibility of that evidence. The question arises not through its exclusion at trial but on a motion for a new trial in order to be able to introduce it as newly discovered. The petitioner, Baxter Griffin, was convicted…
-
Creel v. Lone Star Def. Corp., 171 F.2d 964 (5th Cir. 1949)…e intention of this rule is to put an end to useless and expensive litigation if there is no geniune issue as to any material fact. The judgment appealed from is Affirmed. Kennedy v. Silas Mason Co., 334 U.S. 249, 68 S.Ct. 1031; Murpliey v. Reed, 335 U.S. 866, 69 S.Ct. 105. Paragraph II. “Plaintiffs state that the defendant is engaged in the production of goods for commerce and in acts necessary for the production of goods for commerce at all times pertinent to the complainant filed herein within the me…