COSMOPOLITAN SHIPPING CO., INC.

v.

MCALLISTER; FINK V. SHEPARD STEAMSHIP CO.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Elgin, 182 F.2d 1 (7th Cir. 1950)
  …tion to terminal switching carriers engaged in -transferring cars as- to other carriers engaged in interstate commerce. With one exception, the facts of the case, United States v. South Buffalo Railway Co., 2 Cir., 168 F. 2d 948, certiorari denied, 335 U.S. 870, 69 S.Ct. 165, were very similar to -those here involved, and the Court of Appeals held that the -transfers were subject to the requirements of § 9. The movements there complained of took place wholly within an area operated as a single yard having…
• Casey v. Am. Exp. Lines, Inc., 176 F.2d 337 (2d Cir. 1949)
  …med in Casey v. American Export Lines, 2 Cir., 173 F. 2d 324 but we directed that our mandate be withheld until the Supreme Court should decide the case of McAllister v. Cosmopolitan Shipping Company, 2 Cir., 169 F. 2d 4, then pending on certiorari, 335 U.S. 870, 69 S.Ct. 167. The McAllister case was reversed on June 27, 1949 for the reason that a general agent under the standard form of agreement is not liable to a seaman injured by negligence of the officers or crew of a vessel owned-by the United States.…