BRADY TRANSFER & STORAGE CO. ET AL.
v.
UNITED STATES ET AL.
BRADY TRANSFER & STORAGE CO. ET AL.
UNITED STATES ET AL.
335 U.S. 875
Supreme Court of the United States (1948)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. United States v. Carolina Freight Carriers Corp., 315 U. S. 475.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
City OF Watseka v. Ill. Pub. Action Council & Am. Civil Liberties Union, 796 F.2d 1547 (7th Cir. 1986)…t has traditionally respected the right of a householder to bar, by order or notice, solicitors, hawkers, and peddlers from his property. See Martin v. City of Struthers, supra; cf. Hall v. Commonwealth, 188 Va. 72, 49 S.E. 2d 369, appeal dismissed, 335 U.S. 875, 69 S.Ct. 240, 93 L.Ed. 418 (1948).... [*1571] To hold less would tend to license a form of trespass and would make hardly more sense than to say that a radio or television viewer may not twist the dial to cut off an offensive or boring communicatio…
Authorities Cited
- United States v. Carolina Freight Carriers Corp., 315 U.S. 475 (U.S. 1942)