MAMLIN ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Borges v. ART Steel Co., Inc., 246 F.2d 735 (2d Cir. 1957)
  …s to all the wage increases involved in this appeal, whether conditioned on consecutive working service, presence on the job on a certain day, or increases in cost of living index. Loeb v. Kivo, 2 Cir., 169 F. 2d 346, certiorari denied Kivo v. Loeb, 335 U.S. 891, 69 S.Ct. 246, 93 L.Ed. 429. For those increases which are conditioned on consecutive working service of a certain number of days we place our decision on an additional ground as well, for these raises come within the statutory definition of “senior…
• Plomb Tool Co. v. Sanger, 193 F.2d 260 (9th Cir. 1951)
  …ope of the Act. Such is not the case here. Since we conclude that Sanger is and was an independent contractor, he is in no position to benefit ,by the Act. Appellee relies on King v. Southwestern Greyhound, 10 Cir., 169 F. 2d 497, certiorari denied 335 U.S. 891, 69 S.Ct. 245, 93 L.Ed. 428, in support of the proposition that although the contract of the litigants designates the status as one of independent contractorship, it is the effect of the contract that is controlling, rather than what the parties cho…
• Ty Saiki and George Saiki v. United States, 306 F.2d 642 (8th Cir. 1962)
  …; Cannon Valley Milling Co. v. United States, D.C.Minn., 1945, 59 F.Supp. 785. See also Knight v. Cameron Joyce & Co., 8 Cir., 1958, 252 F. 2d 103, 107; King v. Southwestern Greyhound Lines, Inc., 10 Cir., 1948, 169 F. 2d 497, 498, certiorari denied 335 U.S. 891, 69 S.Ct. 245, 93 L.Ed. 428; Dimmitt-Rickhoff-Bayer Real Estate Co. v. Finnegan, 8 Cir., 1950, 179 F. 2d 882. Even some reservation of control in the hands of the taxpayers does not abrogate the independent contractor relationship where the contrac…