GRAND RIVER DAM AUTHORITY

v.

GRAND-HYDRO

Citator

Cited By

• Howlett v. Rose, 496 U.S. 356 (U.S. 1990)
  …garding the administration of the courts, we must act with utmost caution before deciding that it is obligated to entertain the claim. See Missouri ex rel. Southern R. Co. v. Mayfield, 340 U. S. 1 (1950); Georgia Rail Road & Banking Co. v. Musgrove, 335 U. S. 900 (1949) (per curiam); Herb v. Pitcairn, 324 U. S. 117 (1945); Douglas v. New York, N. H. & H. R. Co., 279 U. S. 377 (1929). The requirement that a state court of competent jurisdiction treat federal law as the law of the land does not necessarily inc…
• Ga. R.R. & Banking Co. v. Redwine, 342 U.S. 299 (U.S. 1952)
  …State which could not be maintained in the state courts. Musgrove v. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co., 204 Ga. 139, 49 S. E. 2d 26 (1948). We dismissed an appeal from that judgment because it was based upon a nonfederal ground adequate to support it. 335 U. S. 900 (1949). Thereafter, appellant filed this action in the District Court to enjoin appellee from assessing or collecting ad valorem taxes contrary to its legislative charter. Appellant also asked that appellee’s threatened acts be adjudged in violatio…
• Idaho v. Coeur d'Alene Tribe OF Idaho, 521 U.S. 261 (U.S. 1997)
  …ary concomitant of a federal right, availability of such relief in federal courts may not free the states from an obligation to provide it as well”). Nor was General Oil overruled or otherwise “abandoned” by Georgia R. R. & Banking Co. v. Musgrove, 335 U. S. 900 (1949), in which the Court dismissed an appeal from a decision of the Supreme Court of Georgia holding that state sovereign immunity barred suits asserting constitutional claims against state officials. Cf. 16B C. Wright, A. Miller, & E. Cooper, Fed…