PROPPER, RECEIVER,

v.

CLARK, ATTORNEY GENERAL, SUCCESSOR TO THE ALIEN PROPERTY CUSTODIAN

Citator

Cited By

• Propper v. Clark, 337 U.S. 472 (U.S. 1949)
  …1941, petitioner, upon the default of AKM, was appointed permanent receiver of that association’s assets. Thereafter followed the vesting order, September 4,1943, and this suit, April 22,1946. Upon the limited grant of the petition for certiorari, 335 U. S. 902, the issues argued before this Court and now to be decided are whether the appointment of petitioner ás temporary receiver on June 12, 1941, or his appointment as permanent receiver on September 29,1941, by relation back, passed title to him of the…
• The NEW W. Corp. v. NYM Co. OF Cal., Inc., 595 F.2d 1194 (9th Cir. 1979)
  …marked goods in an appropriate segment of the public mind” as those of appellee NYM. Although mere advertising by itself may not establish priority of use, Consumers Petroleum Co. v. Consumers Co. of Illinois, 169 F. 2d 153 (CA7 1948), cert. denied 335 U.S. 902, 69 S.Ct. 406, 93 L.Ed. 437 (1949); Deltronics, Inc. v. H. L. Dalis, Inc., 158 U.S.P.Q. 475 (1968), the totality of appellee’s prior actions, taken together, establish a right to use the trade-mark and trade name “New West.” 430,000 individuals rece…
• Stiftung v. VEB Carl Zeiss Jena, 433 F.2d 686 (2d Cir. 1970)
  …It has been held also that a plaintiff is not entitled to a monetary award when the defendant apparently acted in a good faith belief in his right to use the mark. Consumers Petroleum Co. v. Consumers Co., 169 F. 2d 153 (7th Cir. 1948), cert. denied 335 U.S. 902, 69 S.Ct. 406, 93 L.Ed. 437 (1949). In the decree entered April 1, 1969, it is recited that since in or about 1953, appellants “have, in violation of § 43(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a), from time to time falsely described and falsely de…