DAGGS

v.

KLEIN, REAR ADMIRAL, U. S. NAVY, ET AL.; AND BRAITO V. KLEIN, REAR ADMIRAL, U. S. NAVY, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (31 total)

• Fla. Power & Light Co. v. Int'l Bhd. OF Elec. Workers, 417 U.S. 790 (U.S. 1974)
  …o Oil City Brass Works v. NLRB, 357 F. 2d 466 (CA5 1966); NLRB v. Fullerton Publishing Co., 283 F. 2d 545 (CA9 1960); NLRB v. Griggs Equipment, Inc., 307 F. 2d 275 (CA5 1962) ; NLRB v. Edward G. Budd Mfg. Co., 169 F. 2d 571 (CA6 1948), cert. denied, 335 U. S. 908 (1949),18 and the right to refuse to engage in collective bargaining with them, see L. A. Young Spring & Wire Corp. v. NLRB, 82 [*809] U. S. App. D. C. 327, 163 F. 2d 905 (1947), cert. denied, 333 U. S. 837 (1948). The legislative history of §§…
• Ohio Power Co. v. N.L.R.B., 176 F.2d 385 (6th Cir. 1949)
  …rity is not of a merely routine or clerical nature, hut requires the use of independent judgment.” This section is to be interpreted in the disjunctive, National Labor Relations Board v. Edward G. Budd, Mfg. Co., 6 Cir., 169 F. 2d 571, cert. denied 335 U.S. 908, 69 S.Ct. 411, and the possession of any one of the authorities listed in § 2(11) places the employee invested with this authority in the supervisory class. It is not contended that the control operators have authority to hire, transfer, suspend, l…
• JAS. H. Matthews & Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 354 F.2d 432 (8th Cir. 1965)
  …described for all or any definite part of the employee’s time. It is the existence of the power which determines the classification.” Id., at 388. Accord, N. L. R. B. v. Edward G. Budd Mfg. Co., 169 F. 2d 571, 575, 576, 579 (6 Cir.), cert. denied, 335 U.S. 908, 69 S.Ct. 411, 93 L.Ed. 441; N. L. R. B. v. Leland-Gifford Co., 200 F. 2d 620, 626 (1 Cir.). However, “(i)t is not [*435] alone that (the employee) may hire or fire or lay off or discipline. He must do so in the interest of the employer. * * * (T)…