CLARKE
v.
RAGEN, WARDEN
CLARKE
RAGEN, WARDEN
336 U.S. 908
Supreme Court of the United States (1949)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State OF Tex. v. Seatrain Int'l, 518 F.2d 175 (5th Cir. 1975)…ministrative process of the FMC. Delaware River Port Authority v. Transamerican Trailer Transport, Inc., 501 F. 2d 917 (3d Cir. 1974) (cited hereafter as TTT); West India Fruit & Steamship Co. v. Seatrain Lines, 170 F. 2d 775 (2d Cir. 1948), dism’d, 336 U.S. 908, 69 S.Ct. 514, 93 L.Ed. 1072 (1949); F. M. C. v. Australia/U. S. Atlantic & Gulf Conf., 337 F.Supp. 1032 (S.D.N.Y.1972); Delaware River Port Authority v. United States Lines, Inc., 331 F.Supp. 441 (E.D.Pa.1971); Federal Maritime Commission v. Atla…
-
Sheehan v. Purolator Courier Corp. & Purolator, Inc., 676 F.2d 877 (2d Cir. 1981)…sume incidental equity jurisdiction with respect to a claim pending before an administrative agency had been recognized by this Court in West India Fruit & Steamship Co. v. Seatrain Lines, Inc., 170 F. 2d 775, 778-79 (2d Cir. 1948), cert. dismissed, 336 U.S. 908, 69 S.Ct. 514, 93 L.Ed. 1072 (1949), cited by the Supreme Court in Dean Foods, supra. West India involved a defendant carrier’s proposed change in cargo transportation rates, which was subject to review by the United States Maritime Commission. Supp…
-
ALL Am. Airways, Inc. v. Vill. of Cedar-Hurst, 201 F.2d 273 (2d Cir. 1953)…ave no standing in court. This, however, is clearly contrary to the express provisions and intent of amended Fed.Rules Civ.Proc. 24(b), 28 U.S.C.A. West India Fruit & S. S. Co. v. Seatrain Lines, 2 Cir., 170 F. 2d 775, 778, 779, certiorari dismissed 336 U.S. 908, 69 S.Ct. 514, 93 L.Ed. 1072; Federal Intervention in Private Actions Involving the Public Interest, 65 Harv.L.Rev. 319, 328. Additional authority for the intervention is supplied by 28 U.S.C. § 1345 and 49 U.S.C.A. §§ 647, 648. Idlewild is now one…