WOODS

v.

INTERSTATE REALTY CO.

Citator

Cited By (17 total)

• Robert Lawrence Co., Inc. v. Devonshire Fabrics, Inc., 271 F.2d 402 (2d Cir. 1959)
  …s been found the party seeking the arbitration generally first brought up the subject only after long delay or when the trial was near at hand. American Locomotive Co. v. Chemical Research Corp., 6 Cir., 1948, 171 F. 2d 115, cer-tiorari denied 1949, 336 U.S. 909, 69 S.Ct. 515, 93 L.Ed. 1074; Radiator Specialty Co. v. Cannon Mills, Inc., 4 Cir., 1938, 97 F. 2d 318, 117 A.L.R. 299; La Nacional Platanera, S.C.L. v. North American F. & S.S. Corp., 5 Cir., 1936, 84 F. 2d 881. The claim that Devon-shire’s rejecti…
• Standard OIL Co. OF Cal. v. Moore, 251 F.2d 188 (9th Cir. 1957)
  …ore’s service station. In determining whether a particular witness is qualified to express an expert opinion, the trial court is called upon to exercise a sound discretion. Pollard v. Hawfield, 83 U.S.App.D.C. 374, 170 F. 2d 170, certiorari denied, 336 U.S. 909, 69 S.Ct. 514, 93 L.Ed. 1073. Whether the witness has had occupational experience in the particular field embraced by the hypothetical question is a factor to be considered in determining his qualifications. But it is not controlling. The court may…
• Jenkins v. United States, 307 F.2d 637 (D.C. Cir. 1962)
  …ealth, Action for Mental Health 244-50 (1961). . The court may conduct this hearing in the presence of the jury unless special circumstances warrant its exclusion. . Cf. Pollard v. Hawfield, 83 U.S.App.D.C. 374, 170 F. 2d 170 (1948), cert. denied, 336 U.S. 909, 69 S.Ct. 514, 93 L.Ed. 1073 (1949). Compare State v. Padilla, 66 N.M. 289, 347 P. 2d 312, 78 A.L.R.2d 908 (1959). See also McDonald, supra note 8. The qualification of a particular witness to testify as an expert is largely within the domain of th…