AMERICAN FOUNDRY EQUIPMENT CO.

v.

PANGBORN CORPORATION

Citator

Cited By

• Fontainebleau Hotel Corp. v. Young, 162 So. 2d 303 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964)
  …ical federal rule of practice (Rule 56 of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for the United States District Courts). Biggins v. Oltmer Iron Works, 7 Cir. 1946, 154 F. 2d 214; Coffman v. Federal Laboratories, Inc., 3 Cir. 1948, 171 F. 2d 94, cert. den. 336 U.S. 913, 69 S.Ct. 603, 93 L.Ed. 1076; Commonwealth Ins. Co. of N. Y. v. O’Henry Tent & A. Co., 7 Cir. 1959, 266 F. 2d 200, 75 A.L.R.2d 1198. See 6 Moore, Federal Practice, ¶ 56.20[3] Part 3 (2nd ed. 1953) ; and Annot. 75 A.L.R.2d 1201, 1209-1213. And see, c…
• Sandor Schwartz v. Cyrus S. Eaton, 264 F.2d 195 (2d Cir. 1959)
  …Emrich Co. v. Greenwood, 4 Cir., 242 F. 2d 737, certiorari denied 353 U.S. 976, 77 S.Ct. 1060, 1 L.Ed.2d 1137; Panichella v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 3 Cir., 252 F. 2d 452; Coffman v. Federal Laboratories, 3 Cir., 171 F. 2d 94, 96-97, certiorari denied 336 U.S. 913, 69 S.Ct. 603, 93 L.Ed. 1076; 6 Moore’s Federal Practice ¶(54.33, pp. 238-240 (2d Ed. 1953) and 1958 Supp.; 38 A.L.R.2d 383-386. We know of no authority to the contrary.4 From every angle the district court’s action in attempting to dismiss a part…
• King v. The Cal. Co., 224 F.2d 193 (5th Cir. 1955)
  …c Coast Line R. R. Co., 5 Cir., 1952, 196 F. 2d 1015 and Tauzin v. St. Paul Mercury Indemnity Co., 5 Cir., 1953, 195 F. 2d 223. . Such a time factor was involved in Coff-man v. Federal Laboratories, 3 Cir., 1948, 171 F. 2d 94, 96, certiorari denied 336 U.S. 913, 69 S.Ct. 603, 93 L.Ed. 1076. Summary judgment had been granted with respect to royalties over a certain time period. Responding to the claim that recovery for a different time period was barred by that judgment from which no appeal had been taken,…