PETTI
v.
UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1949-02-28
No. 118
336 U.S. 916 Supreme Court of the United States (1949) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:

Per Curiam:

The Government having moved the Court to vacate the judgments and remand the case to the District Court for a new trial, the motion is granted, and the judgments of the Court of Appeals and the District Court are vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York with directions to grant a new trial.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Quicksall v. Michigan, 339 U.S. 660 (U.S. 1950)
    …denied his motion. The Supreme Court of Michigan affirmed. 322 Mich. 351, 33 N. W. 2d 904. We brought the case here out of a zealous regard for due observance of the safeguards of the Fourteenth Amendment in the enforcement of a State’s penal code. 336 U. S. 916. The record exacts the holding that the petitioner has failed to sustain the burden of proving such a disregard of fundamental fairness in the imposition of punishment by the State as alone would justify this Court to invalidate the sentence by reas…
  • LaMAGNA v. United States, 646 F.2d 775 (2d Cir. 1981)
    …2314, since they are “akin to currency as a circulating medium” and can readily be passed for value even when endorsed by thieves. United States v. Petti, 168 F. 2d 221, 223 (2d Cir. 1948), vacated and remanded for new trial on motion of government, 336 U.S. 916, 69 S.Ct. 639, 93 L.Ed. 1079 (1949). Finally, we find no support in the record for the claim that appellant did not receive effective assistance of counsel. The record reflects that he was represented by counsel of his own choosing and that he had…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw