COOK

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (29 total)

• Farrow v. United States, 580 F.2d 1339 (9th Cir. 1978)
  …Battaglia v. United States, 390 F. 2d 256, 259 (9th Cir. 1968). This same practice has been followed with motions under Fed.R.Crim.P. 35 for correction or reduction of sentence, see Cook v. United States, 171 F. 2d 567 (1st Cir. 1948), cert. denied, 336 U.S. 926, 69 S.Ct. 647, 93 L.Ed. 1088 (1949). . See also Communication from the Chief Justice of the United States, Rules of Procedure, H.Doc. No. 94-464, 94th Cong., 2d Sess. 153 (1976). . As our decisions in Leano v. United States, 494 F. 2d 361 (9th Cir…
• United States v. Hayes, 589 F.2d 811 (5th Cir. 1979)
  …eto, 453 F. 2d 376 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 909, 92 S.Ct. 1618, 31 L.Ed.2d 819 (1972). Leaving the determination of maximum sentences to the court is not uncommon. See Binkley v. Hunter, 170 F. 2d 848, 849 (10th Cir. 1948), cert. denied, 336 U.S. 926, 69 S.Ct. 645, 93 L.Ed. 1087 (1949). The statute can be reasonably construed to authorize a maximum sentence. United States v. Rich, 518 F. 2d 980 (8th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 427 U.S. 907, 96 S.Ct. 3193, 49 L.Ed.2d 1200 (1976). Appellants furt…
• Caille v. United States, 487 F.2d 614 (5th Cir. 1973)
  …e right to be present at such re-sentencing, in compliance with the relevant provision of Rule 43. See U. S. v. McCray, supra; United States v. Brown, 5 Cir. 1972, 456 F. 2d 1112; Cook v. United States, 1 Cir. 1948, 171 F. 2d 567, cert, denied 1949, 336 U.S. 926, 69 S.Ct. 647, 93 L.Ed. 1088; see also Williamson v. United States, 5 Cir. 1959, 265 F. 2d 236. The district court apparently was of the opinion that appellant need not be present because the special parole term imposed was the minimum authorized b…