BROWN

v.

HUDSPETH, WARDEN, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• MacINNIS v. United States, 191 F.2d 157 (9th Cir. 1951)
  …opportunity to observe the expression, manner of speaking, bearing and attitude of appellant. In these circumstances we cannot hold that no contempt had been committed. Fisher v. Pace, 1949, 336 U.S. 155, 69 S.Ct. 425, 93 L.Ed. 569, rehearing denied 336 U.S. 928, 69 S.Ct. 653, 93 L.Ed. 1089; United States v. Bollenbach, 2 Cir., 1942, 125 F. 2d 458. Appellant contends that since the conduct involved occurred on February'l, 1950, and the Order and Certificate of contempt were not signed until February 28, 19…
• United States v. Mitchell, 553 F.2d 996 (5th Cir. 1977)
  …s the authority to control overtime pay of workers in the employ of American contractors in Iran and Iraq, but it did not intend to exercise its power); Vermilya-Brown Co. v. Connell, 1948, 335 U.S. 377, 69 S.Ct. 140, 93 L.Ed. 76, reh. denied, 1949, 336 U.S. 928, 69 S.Ct. 652, 93 L.Ed. 1089 (although Congress did not intend such an extension, the United States could apply the Fair Labor Standards Act to employment relationships involving American citizens in Bermuda); Blackmer v. United States, 1932, 284 U.…
• Holiday v. State of Md., 177 F.2d 844 (4th Cir. 1949)
  …plication for habeas corpus on practically the same grounds was denied by the Maryland courts. Holliday v. Warden, 59 A. 2d 777 and Holliday v. Warden, 62 A. 2d 573, certiorari being denied in the latter case by the Supreme Court, Holiday v. Warden, 336 U.S. 928, 69 S.Ct. 650, 93 L.Ed. -. Certiorari was also denied by the Supreme Court to the Criminal Court of Baltimore, Holiday v. Swenson, 334 U.S. 822, 68 S.Ct. 1075, 92 L.Ed. 1751. There are no allegations which would justify the issuance of a writ of hab…