COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
v.
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TELEPHONE CO.
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TELEPHONE CO.
336 U.S. 929
Supreme Court of the United States (1949)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Dep't of Mental Hygiene of Cal. v. Kirchner, 380 U.S. 194 (U.S. 1965)…ople v. Sullivan, 60 Cal. App. 2d 539, 141 P. 2d 230; People v. England, 140 Cal. App. 310, 35 P. 2d 565; 11 Cal. Jur. 2d §272, and cases cited therein. See also Los Angeles v. Southern Cal. Tel. Co., 32 Cal. 2d 378, 196 P. 2d 773, appeal dismissed, 336 U. S. 929. See Note, Supreme Court Treatment of State Court Cases Exhibiting Ambiguous Grounds of Decision, 62 Col. L. Rev. 822 (1962). Appellant’s Reply Brief, p. 2, presented the rhetorical question: “Is not the taking of money from a daughter, or her est…
-
King-Seeley Thermos Co. v. Refrigerated Dispensers, Inc., 354 F.2d 533 (10th Cir. 1965)…Corp. v. Midwestern Instruments, supra, 260 F. 2d at 816; Oliver United Filters v. Silver, 10 Cir., 206 F. 2d 658, 662; Harris v. National Machine Works, 10 Cir., 171 F. 2d 85, 88, cert. denied 336 U.S. 905, 69 S.Ct. 491, 93 L.Ed. 1070, reh. denied 336 U.S. 929, 69 S.Ct. 655, 93 L.Ed. 1090. As said in Mott Corp. v. Sunflower Industries, Inc., supra, 314 F. 2d at 879, “An invention or discovery is new or possesses the requisite element of novelty if it involves the presence of some element, or the new posi…