MCLAURIN

v.

MISSISSIPPI

Citator

Cited By (31 total)

• Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (U.S. 1962)
  …Court, in cases involving discrimination against the Negro’s right to vote, has recognized not only the action at law for damages,14 but, in appropriate circumstances, the extraordinary remedy of declaratory or injunctive relief.15 Schnell v. Davis, 336 U. S. 933; Terry v. Adams, 345 U. S. 461.16 Injunctions in these cases, it should be noted, would not have restrained state-wide general elections. Compare Giles v. Harris, 189 U. S. 475. 4. The Court has refused to exercise its jurisdiction to pass on “abst…
• Vill. of Arlington Heights v. Metro. Hous. Dev. Corp., 429 U.S. 252 (U.S. 1977)
  …is one evidentiarysource, particularly if it reveals a series of official actions taken for invidious purposes. See Lane v. Wilson, supra; Griffin v. School Board, 377 U. S. 218 (1964); Davis v. Schnell, 81 F. Supp. 872 (SD Ala.), aff’d per curiam, 336 U. S. 933 (1949); cf. Keyes v. School Dist. No. 1, Denver Colo., supra, at 207. The specific sequence of events leading up to the challenged decision also may shed some light on the decisionmaker’s purposes. Reitman v. Mulkey, 387 U. S. 369, 373-376 (1967); G…
• McNEESE v. Bd. OF Educ. FOR Cmty. Unit Sch. Dist. 187 Cahokia, 373 U.S. 668 (U.S. 1963)
  …in the federal courts.6 Monroe v. Pape, supra, at 183; Gayle v. Browder, 352 U. S. 903, affirming 142 F. Supp. 707; Borders v. Rippy, 247 F. 2d 268, 271. Cf., e. g., Lane v. Wilson, 307 U. S. 268; Smith v. Allwright, 321 U. S. 649; Schnell v. Davis, 336 U. S. 933, affirming 81 F. Supp. 872; Turner v. Memphis, 369 U. S. 350. Moreover, it is by no means clear that Illinois law provides petitioners with an administrative remedy suffi.ciently adequate to preclude prior resort to á federal court [*675] for prote…