KLAPPROTT

v.

UNITED STATES, 335 U. S. 601

Citator

Cited By (11 total)

• Ryles v. United States, 183 F.2d 944 (10th Cir. 1950)
  …instruction on the law of entrapment had been requested. Ryles v. U. S., 10 Cir., 172 F. 2d 72, 73. The Supreme Court of the United States, at the suggestion of the Solicitor General, reversed and remanded'the case for a new trial. Ryles v. U. S., 336 U.S. 949, 69 S.Ct. 882, 93 L.Ed. 1104. On the second trial, the defendant admitted the transaction charged in the second count of the indictment and interposed a. defense of entrapment. The jury found the defendant guilty on the second count and he was sen…
• Apodaca v. United States, 188 F.2d 932 (10th Cir. 1951)
  …Rule 30, but that notice may be taken of a grave error which amounts to the denial of a fundamental right of the accused even though no exception was taken. Ryles v. United States, 10 Cir., 172 F. 2d 72; judgment vacated apparently on other ground, 336 U.S. 949, 69 S.Ct. 882, 93 L.Ed. 1104. No grave error amounting to the denial of a fundamental right is presented here, and therefore the question is not open to review. The next contention is that the court erred in its instructions with respect to the mea…
• United States v. Riley, 363 F.2d 955 (2d Cir. 1966)
  …ue to the jury although the evidence on propensity strongly favored the prosecution. See, e.g., Wall v. United States, 65 F. 2d 993 (5 Cir. 1933); Ryles v. United States, 172 F. 2d 72, 74 (10 Cir. 1948), rev’d on suggestion of the Solicitor General, 336 U.S. 949, 69 S.Ct. 882, 93 L.Ed. 1104 (1949), see 183 F. 2d 944 (10 Cir.), cert. denied, 340 U.S. 877, 71 S.Ct. 123, 95 L.Ed. 637 (1950); United States v. Sawyer, 210 F. 2d 169 (3 Cir. 1954); Crisp v. United States, 262 F. 2d 68 (4 Cir. 1958); Johnson v. Uni…