CLAYTON MARK & CO. ET AL.

v.

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

Citator

Cited By (17 total)

• Edward C. REA & 22 Ford Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 497 F.2d 577 (3d Cir. 1974)
  …ding, or some concerted action operating to restrain commerce, may be inferred. See Triangle Conduit & Cable Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, 168 F. 2d 175 (7th Cir. 1948), aff’d sub nom. Clayton Mark & Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, 336 U.S. 956, 69 S.Ct. 888, 93 L.Ed. 1110 (1949). Furthermore, after a careful review of the record, we believe that there is sufficient evidence to support an inference that Ford was á party to an agreement or understanding to [*591] fix the price at which Ford dealers woul…
• United States v. $242, 389 F.3d 1149 (11th Cir. 2004)
  …49 F. 2d 992, 996 (8th Cir.1965); Zimmerman v. Montour R.R., 296 F. 2d 97, 98 (3d Cir.1961); Triangle Conduit & Cable Co. v. Fed. Trade Comm’n, 168 F. 2d 175, 179 (7th Cir.1948), aff'd sub nom., Clayton Mark & Co. v. Fed. Trade Comm’n, 336 U.S. 956, 69 S.Ct. 888, 93 L.Ed. 1110 (1949). When inferring findings consistent with the district court’s judgment, we are not engaging in factfinding ourselves. Instead, we are making the common sense judgment that material factual issues were resolved by the district…
• Nat'l Lead Co. v. Fed. Trade Comm'n, 227 F.2d 825 (7th Cir. 1955)
  …uniform pricing practices, the finding does not necessarily fall. A conspiracy may be proved by circumstantial evidence. Triangle Conduit & Cable Co. v. F. T. C., 7 Cir., 168 F. 2d 175, affirmed sub nom. Clayton Mark & Co. v. F. T. C., 336 U.S. 956, 69 S.Ct. 888, 93 L.Ed. 1110; Allied Paper Mills v. F. T. C., 7 Cir., 168 F. 2d 600, certiorari denied 336 U.S. 918, 69 S.Ct. 640, 93 L.Ed. 1081. As we observed in Fort Howard Paper Co. v. F. T. C., 7 Cir., 156 F. 2d 899, at page 906, certiorari denied 329 U.S. 7…