BARDELL
v.
ILLINOIS
BARDELL
ILLINOIS
336 U.S. 970
Supreme Court of the United States (1949)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 8 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Swan v. Bd. OF Higher Educ. OF the City OF NEW York by Gustave G. Rosenberg, 319 F.2d 56 (2d Cir. 1963)…ad an action seeking similar relief been brought in a court of that state. O’Sullivan v. Felix, 233 U.S. 318, 34 S.Ct. 596, 58 L.Ed. 980 (1914); Hoffman v. Halden, 268 F. 2d 280 (9 Cir. 1959); Wilson v. Hinman, 172 F. 2d 914 (10 Cir.), cert. denied, 336 U.S. 970, 69 S.Ct. 933, 93 L.Ed. 1121 (1949). This, of course, is the rule which prevails generally when Congress has not provided a statute of limitations for a federally-created cause of action. Smith v. Cremins, 308 F. 2d 187 (9 Cir. 1962); Powell v. St…
-
Beard v. Robinson, 563 F.2d 331 (7th Cir. 1977)…l state statutes of limitations for “inju [*338] ries to the rights of another not arising from a contract and not otherwise enumerated.” Crosswhite v. Brown, 424 F. 2d 495 (10th Cir. 1970); Wilson v. Hinman, 172 F. 2d 914 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 336 U.S. 970, 69 S.Ct. 933, 93 L.Ed. 1121 (1949).…
-
Zuniga v. Amfac Foods, Inc., 580 F.2d 380 (10th Cir. 1978)…ed Oklahoma and Kansas limitations periods in civil rights suits brought under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985 and their antecedents. See Crosswhite v. Brown, 424 F. 2d 495, 496 (10th Cir.); Wilson v. Hinman, 172 F. 2d 914, 915 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 336 U.S. 970, 69 S.Ct. 933, 93 L.Ed. 1121. Thus since no federal limitation governs, the timeliness of this suit “. . .is to be determined, as a matter of federal law, by reference to the appropriate state statute of limitations.” Auto Workers v. Hoosier Corp.,…
Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence