SCHUMAN
v.
CALIFORNIA; AND IN RE STINSON

U.S. | 1949-05-16
Nos. 453; No. 487
337 U.S. 903 Supreme Court of the United States (1949) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • In re Elec. Power & Light Corp., 176 F.2d 687 (2d Cir. 1949)
    …to stay consummation of the plan pending determination of the appeals was denied by this court on May 5, 1949. Thereafter petitions for a stay were presented to the Supreme Court and denied by it. In the Matter of Electric Power & Light Corporation, 337 U.S. 903, 69 S.Ct 917. After the court’s approval of the plan, May 27, 1949 was fixed as the consummation date for the first three Parts and July 6, 1949 for Part IV. Judge Clancy's opinion reads as follows: “The Court has not read the record of this case…
  • Kantor v. Am. & Foreign Power Co., Inc., 197 F.2d 307 (1st Cir. 1952)
    …urt’s order, which application was denied for failure of applicant to post a supersedeas bond. No application for a supersedeas was made to this court. Cf. the comments by Justice Frankfurter, dissenting, in In re Electric Power & Light Corp., 1949, 337 U.S. 903, 69 S.Ct. 917, 93 L.Ed. 1717. In fact the plan has already been consummated, on February 29, 1952. Appellants are individual small holders of Foreign Power securities, who appeared in opposition at a late stage in the proceedings, after a satisfact…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw