HARBOR TOWING CORP.

v.

PARKER ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (25 total)

• Safeway Stores v. Safeway Disc. Drugs, Inc., 675 F.2d 1160 (11th Cir. 1982)
  …words of the mark. See Sun Banks, supra, 651 F. 2d at 316. The district court made no finding on the strength of the Safeway mark. One court has found the word to be a coinage. Safeway Stores v. Dunnell, 172 F. 2d 649, 654 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 337 U.S. 907, 69 S.Ct. 1049, 93 L.Ed. 1719 (1949).6 Other than in its use as a mark, the word Safeway does indeed have no meaning, but we do not credit it with the full strength of a coinage since the word merely is a combination of [*1165] two other common word…
• Int'l Controls Corp. v. Vesco, 490 F.2d 1334 (2d Cir. 1974)
  …tion and disposition of securities, even though no consideration or value or price is involved in the transaction. This is not only unprecedented, but is contrary to the holding of the court in Shaw v. Dreyfus, 172 F. 2d 140 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 337 U.S. 907, 69 S.Ct. 1048, 93 L.Ed. 1719 (1949). The question before the court there was whether the receipt of stock rights eon-eededly tantamount to a stock dividend was within the “purchase or sale” definition of the 1934 Act, § 3(a) (13) & (14), 15 U.S.C…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Harris v. Pa. R.R. Co., 361 U.S. 15 (U.S. 1959)
  …man v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 352 U. S. 518. II. Cases in Which Certiorari Was Denied. A. Where lower court withheld case from the jury or overturned a jury verdict for employee and rendered judgment for the employer: Scocozza et al. v. Erie R. Co., 337 U. S. 907. Killian v. Pennsylvania R. Co. et al., 338 U. S. 819. Lavender v. Illinois Central R. Co., 338 U. S. 822. Roberts v. Alabama Great Southern R. Co., 340 U. S. 829. Emmick v. Baltimore & Ohio R. Co., 340 U. S. 831. Roberts v. Missouri-Kansas-Texa…