IN RE ABERNATHY

U.S. | 1949-05-31
No. 585
337 U.S. 913 Supreme Court of the United States (1949) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …e. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed, with directions to the Board to dismiss the complaint. Reversed. 49 Stat. 449 et seq., 29 U. S. C. § 151 et seq. Matter of Colgate-Palmolive-Peet Company, 70 N. L. R. B. 1202. 171 F. 2d 956. 337 U. S. 913. Matter of Rutland Court Owners, Inc., 44 N. L. R. B. 587, 46 N. L. R. B. 1040. Labor Board v. Geraldine Novelty Co., 173 F. 2d 14; Colonie Fibre Co. v. Labor Board, 163 F. 2d 65; Labor Board v. American White Cross Laboratories, 160 F. 2d 75. La…
  • …58 F. 2d 365, certiorari granted 331 U.S. 798, 67 S.Ct. 1305, 91 L.Ed. 1824; certiorari dismissed on motion of petitioner, 332 U.S. 845, 68 S.Ct. 347, 92 L.Ed. 416; Colgate-Palmolive-Peet Co. v. N. L. R. B., 9 Cir., 171 F. 2d 956, certiorari granted 337 U.S. 913, 69 S.Ct. 1155. Cf. Wallace Corp. v. N. L. R. B., 323 U.S. 248, 65 S.Ct. 238, 89 L.Ed. 216. Contra Aluminum Co. of America v. N. L. R. B., 7 Cir., 159 F. 2d 523, 526. We think the Rutland Court rule is sound labor law and approve of it. We agree wi…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw