CALHOUN ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (15 total)

• Roberts v. United States, 498 F.2d 520 (9th Cir. 1974)
  …s, 283 F. 2d 776, 778 (2d Cir. 1960). See also McMahon v. United [*527] States, 342 U.S. 25 (1951). Neither infancy nor any other disability can toll the running of this statute. Sgambati v. United States, 172 F. 2d 297 (2d Cir. 1949), cert. denied, 337 U.S. 938, 69 S.Ct. 1514, 93 L.Ed. 1743 (1949). Accord, Williams v. United States, 133 F.Supp. 319 (E.D.Va.1954), aff’d, 228 F. 2d 129 (4th Cir. 1955), cert. denied, 351 U.S. 986, 76 S.Ct. 1054, 100 L.Ed. 1499 (1956).13 We therefore conclude that to the exte…
• Warner Williams v. United States, 228 F.2d 129 (4th Cir. 1955)
  …ws: “Suits as authorized by this chapter may be brought only within two years after the cause of action arises * * The statute contains no saving clauses for disability of any kind. Sgambati v. United States, 2 Cir., 172 F. 2d 297, certiorari denied 337 U.S. 938, 69 S.Ct. 1514, 93 L.Ed. 1743. Two exceptions to the rigid prevailing rule, that such statutes of limitations cannot be extended under any circumstances, have been carved out by our courts: in the prisoner of war situation, Osbourne v. United State…
• United States v. Roth, 237 F.2d 796 (2d Cir. 1956)
  …out in imposing sentence, defendant has been convicted several times before under both state and federal law. Indeed this case and our discussions somewhat duplicate his earlier appearance in Roth v. Goldman, 2 Cir., 172 F. 2d 788, certiorari denied 337 U.S. 938, 69 S.Ct. 1514, 93 L.Ed. 1743. Defendant claims error in entrapment .because his advertisements were answered by government representatives. But this method of obtaining evidence was specifically approved in Rosen v. United States, supra, 161 U.S.…

  ← 1 / 2 →