RICCARDI

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (29 total)

• United States v. Kelly, 349 F.2d 720 (2d Cir. 1965)
  …ed. The doctrine of past recollection recorded has long been favored by the federal and practically all the state courts that have had occasion to decide the question. See, e. g., United States v. Riccardi, 3 Cir., 1949, 174 F. 2d 883, cert. denied, 337 U.S. 941, 69 S.Ct. 1519, 93 L.Ed. 1746; Papalia v. United States, 5 Cir., 1957, 243 F. 2d 437; Rumely v. United States, 2 Cir., 1923, 293 F. 532, 552, cert. denied, 263 U.S. 713, 44 S.Ct. 38, 68 L.Ed. 520; Commonwealth v. Butts, 1964, 204 Pa.Super. 302, 204…
• United States v. Rose, 215 F.2d 617 (3d Cir. 1954)
  …s first point that Cohen’s records were not admissible because they had been used from the very beginning of his testimony to “refresh” his memory. As we stated in United States v. Riccardi, 3 Cir., 1949, 174 F. 2d 883, 888, certiorari denied, 1949, 337 U.S. 941, 69 S.Ct. 1519, 93 L.Ed. 1746 “ ‘When a party uses an earlier statement of his own witness to refresh the witness’ memory, the only evidence recognized as such is the testimony so refreshed.’ ” Observation to this effect was made in United States v.…
• United States v. Davis, 487 F.2d 112 (5th Cir. 1973)
  …ment was accurate at the time that it was prepared. Papalia v. United States, 5 Cir. 1957, 243 F. 2d 437. See also, United States v. Booz, 3 Cir. 1971, 451 F. 2d 719, 725; United States v. Riecardi, 3 Cir. 1949, 174 F. 2d 883, 887-888, cert, denied, 337 U.S. 941, 69 S.Ct. 1519, 93 L.Ed. 1746; Putman v. Moore, 5 Cir. 1941, 119 F. 2d 246; United States v. Kelly, 2 Cir. 1965, 349 F. 2d 720, 770, cert, denied, 384 U.S. 947, 86 S.Ct. 1467, 16 L.Ed.2d 544. Harvey testified that he remembered the conversation and…