CLARK, ATTORNEY GENERAL, AS SUCCESSOR TO THE ALIEN PROPERTY CUSTODIAN,
v.
MANUFACTURERS TRUST CO.; AND MANUFACTURERS TRUST CO. V. CLARK, ATTORNEY GENERAL, AS SUCCESSOR TO THE ALIEN PROPERTY CUSTODIAN
CLARK, ATTORNEY GENERAL, AS SUCCESSOR TO THE ALIEN PROPERTY CUSTODIAN,
MANUFACTURERS TRUST CO.; AND MANUFACTURERS TRUST CO. V. CLARK, ATTORNEY GENERAL, AS SUCCESSOR TO THE ALIEN PROPERTY CUSTODIAN
337 U.S. 953
Supreme Court of the United States (1949)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 8 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Johnson v. Eisentrager, 339 U.S. 763 (U.S. 1950)…6 companion cases, 335 U. S. 841; In re Eckstein, 335 U. S. 851; In re Heim, 335 U. S. 856; In re Dammann, and 4 companion cases, 336 U. S. 922-923; In re Muhlbauer, and 57 companion cases, covering at least 80 persons, 336 U. S. 964; In re Felsch, 337 U. S. 953; In re Buerger, 338 U. S. 884; In re Hans, 339 U. S. 976; In re Schmidt, 339 U. S. 976; Lammers v. United States, 339 U. S. 976. And see also Milch v. United States, 332 U. S. 789. These cases and the variety of questions they raised are analyzed a…
-
McGRATH v. Mfrs. Tr. Co., 338 U.S. 241 (U.S. 1949)…sly allowed interest to the Custodian under circumstances largely comparable to those in the case below. The bank asked leave to present its contentions [*246] should the Custodian’s petition for certiorari be granted. All applications were granted. 337 U. S. 953. I. The Trading with the Enemy Act is a war measure.7 It creates powerful and swift executive and summary procedures particularly for the seizure of the property of enemies by legal process as an effective alternative to seizure by military force.…
-
United States v. Ohio Power Co., 353 U.S. 98 (U.S. 1957)…e interests of justice would make unfair the strict application of our rules. This policy finds expression in the manner in which we have exercised our power over our own judgments, both in civil and criminal cases. Clark v. Manufacturers Trust Co., 337 U. S. 953; Goldbaum v. United States, 347 U. S. 1007; Banks v. United States, 347 U. S. 1007; McFee v. United States, 347 U. S. 1007; Remmer v. United States, 348 U. S. 904; Florida ex rel. Hawkins v. Board of Control, 350 U. S. 413; Boudoin v. Lykes Bros. S.…1 / 2