ALLEGHENY MUTUAL CASUALTY CO.

v.

STATE

Citator

Cited By

• "Bill" J. Templeton v. Creative Loafing Tampa, Inc., 552 So. 2d 288 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989)
  …ackstone. Appellant was not an owner of the selling corporation, Steppin’ Out, so as to possibly entitle appellee to injunctive relief for impairment of good will. See Yoo Hoo of Florida Corp. v. Catroneo, 175 So. 2d 220 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 179 So. 2d 212 (Fla.1965). There is no evidence appellant engaged in disloyal acts in anticipation of future competition. See Insurance Field Services, Inc. v. White & White Inspection & Audit Service, Inc., 384 So. 2d 303 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980). Since none of these…
• Taylor v. Gunter Trucking Co., Inc., 520 So. 2d 624 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988)
  …ation of the standards of culpable negligence set forth in the decisions cited above, the punitive damages issue must be submitted to the jury. E.g., Doral Country Club, Inc. v. Lindgren Plumbing Co., 175 So. 2d 570 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965), cert. denied, 179 So. 2d 212 (Fla.1965). It is always for the jury, not the court, to decide whether punitive damages should be awarded once the legal threshhold has been proven by the evidence. Certainly the punitive damages issue must always go to the jury when the degree of…
• In re the Est. of Brewer Corbin v. Corbin, 391 So. 2d 731 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980)
  …n in Florida is the interest’s reasonable market value, measured as of the time and place of conversion. Lilly v. Bronson, 177 So. 218, 129 Fla. 675 (1937); Doral Country Club, Inc. v. Lindgren Plumbing Co., 175 So. 2d 570 (Fla.3d DCA), cert. denied 179 So. 2d 212 (Fla. 1965), after remand to trial court 196 So. 2d 242 (Fla.3d DCA 1967); Klein v. Newburger, Loeb & Co., 151 So. 2d 879 (Fla.3d DCA), after remand 153 So. 2d 344 (Fla.3d DCA 1963). Although argument might well be made that lost profits and other…