EMPIRE PACKING CO. ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (18 total)

• Gonzalez v. State, 97 So. 2d 127 (Fla. 2d DCA 1957)
  …his rule of law. See 58 Am.Jur. section 745, p. 402; Annotations, 6 A.L.R. 1647f; 25 A.L.R. 348f; 103 A.L.R. 367f; Viberg v. State, 1903, 138 Ala. 100, 35 So. 53; and United States v. Empire Packing Co., 7 Cir., 1949, 174 F. 2d 16, certiorari denied 337 U.S. 959, 69 S.Ct. 1534, 93 L.Ed. 1758. The trial court was therefore correct in permitting this line .of questioning. Appellant’s point number four questions whether appellant was denied a fair trial through remarks of the prosecuting attorney in his concl…
• Mancusi v. Stubbs, 408 U.S. 204 (U.S. 1972)
  …ulative to keep the controversy alive. Even when an appeal is pending, see, e. g., Bloch v. United States, 226 F. 2d 185, 188 (CA9 1955), cert. denied, 350 U. S. 948 (1956); United States v. Empire Packing Co., 174 F. 2d 16, 20 (CA7), cert. denied, 337 U. S. 959 (1949); Proposed Rules of Evidence for the United States District Courts § 609 (e) (1972), and Advisory Committee’s Note.…
• Aston Bartholomew v. Universe Tankships, Inc., 263 F.2d 437 (2d Cir. 1959)
  …ed to jury without discussion). . See cases cited Footnote 8, supra and Gonzales v. United Fruit Co., 2 Cir., 1951, 193 F. 2d 479, 480, note 1; Mullen v. Fitz Simons & Connell Dredge & Dock Co., 7 Cir., 1948, 172 F. 2d 601, certiorari denied, 1949, 337 U.S. 959, 69 S.Ct. 1534, 93 L.Ed. 1758; Lindquist v. Dilkes, 3 Cir., 1942, 127 F. 2d 21; Nolan v. General Seafoods Corp., 1. Cir., 1940, 112 F. 2d 515; Stevens v. R. O’Brien & Co., 1 Cir., 1933, 62 F. 2d 632. See also 5 Moore, Federal Practice p. 278 (1951)…