BALL, TRUSTEE,
v.
UNITED STATES ET AL.
BALL, TRUSTEE,
UNITED STATES ET AL.
338 U.S. 802
Supreme Court of the United States (1949)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Cascade Natural Gas Corp. v. EL Paso Natural GAS Co., 386 U.S. 129 (U.S. 1967)…States, 371 U. S. 576.17 And we have upheld [*152] denial of intervention to a private party who claimed that a decree negotiated between the Government and an antitrust defendant failed to carry out the mandate of this Court. Ball v. United States, 338 U. S. 802. The results which follow from the Court’s rejection of the practical wisdom embodied in these decisions are apparent. There were over 20 applications to intervene in the decree proceedings below. The Court’s construction of 24 (a) (3) would requir…
-
Rca Commc'ns, Inc. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 201 F.2d 694 (D.C. Cir. 1952)…L.Ed. 2065; N.Y. Central Securities Corp. v. United States, 1932, 287 U.S. 12, 53 S.Ct. 45, 77 L.Ed. 138; Clarke v. United States, D.C.D.C.1951, 101 F.Supp. 587; Hudson Transit Lines v. United States, D.C.S.D.N.Y.1948, 82 F.Supp. 153, affirmed 1949, 338 U.S. 802, 70 S.Ct. 59, 94 L.Ed. 485; Norfolk Southern Bus Corp. v. United States, D.C.E.D.Va.1950, 96 F.Supp. 756, affirmed, 1950, 340 U.S. 802, 71 S.Ct. 68, 95 L.Ed. 590; Lang Transp. Corporation v. United States, D.C.S.D.Cal.1948, 75 F.Supp. 915; C. E. Hal…